Tuesday 3 February 2009

the camera

I have long held a fascination for photography and cameras. They fall into my category of ‘magical’ things, along with magnets, gyroscopes, magnifying glasses and fire. The ability to capture a visual moment in time is fantastic and still excites me. My earliest experience of photography goes back to the age of around four years old. Two friends of my mother arrived one evening to take some family photos, this was a first for me. Not only did they have a rather impressive camera but also lights on stands and large flashbulbs. The whole affair was quite exciting, although I didn’t understand what it was all leading to until we got copies of the pictures a few weeks later. This was the start.

Photography for ordinary folk was rare, reserved mainly for special occasions such as holidays, and visits from far-off relatives. Film and processing were an expensive luxury. We had a simple Ensign box camera. It was an ugly thing but provided my first glimpse into this visual sorcery. There was a small internal mirror that reflected the image onto a large magnifying glass on top, which you used to compose the picture. I remember mum allowing me to look down into it and being entranced by the miniature picture of the world around me. I wasn’t allowed to press the shutter button and take a photo for a long time. That was something only adults were entrusted with. It was a pity because mum had poor eyesight and most of her photos were lopsided or cut off half of the subject.

Photos were black and white, colour had been around a long time but it was far too expensive. The roll films held only 12 pictures, unlike the almost limitless capacity of digital photography nowadays, so you couldn’t afford to be extravagant with them. That means that we have relatively few photos to look back on those times but makes them precious. Changing a film was another act of sorcery. You had to find a dark place – a cupboard or shady spot for this procedure. That added to the air of secrecy and mystery about photography that appealed to me. It was usually a job for dad who always seemed a little stressed, as if it was a major responsibility. Once the film was loaded you looked into a small transparent red window on the camera whilst you wound it on. Small arrows could be seen passing by until the number one appeared and it was ready to use.

Our camera eventually started to allow light to leak into it, causing white patches around the edges of the photos. Mum eventually stopped using it and I was allowed to play with it at last. It had only been used for taking photos of people, but I discovered the wider potential of photography as an exciting art, composing pictures in the viewfinder of landscapes, flowers, buildings and unusual angles on the world around me. I pretended there was film inside and got great pleasure from pretending to ‘take’ these pictures. I was about thirteen when I convinced mum to give me the camera and allow me to buy a film. She tried her best to put me off the idea because it leaked light and the pictures would be useless and a waste of money but I didn’t care. I was incredibly excited at the prospect of finding something interesting and making my own pictures. I took my first photos and handed the film in to the chemist shop to get them developed. I had to wait about a week for them. What an exciting time that was when I picked them up. Yes the photos were badly blotched but they were my work. I was hooked.

Mum must have noted this enthusiasm and on my fourteenth birthday, I was presented with one of the wonderful, newly invented, Kodak Instamatic cameras. This was state of the art equipment for the man-in-the-street photographer. The film was held in a lightproof cartridge that you simply dropped into the camera, wound on a few times and was ready to go in seconds. No need for dark cupboards and no blotchy white photos. There was a clip-on flash adaptor that took tiny disposable flashbulbs for indoor shots. I used this little camera for years and eventually started shooting colour slides with it. That took me into another dimension in this magical world. I still have that little camera.

I now have a couple of digital cameras and although they have taken some of the anticipation out of the hobby, I still get that excited buzz from composing a scene in the viewfinder and pressing the button, knowing I have captured something special, a moment in time and space where I stood and the thrill of seeing it later on my computer screen.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Once again,you successfully refreshed my own memories about something. I had not thought about many of the things regarding the early cameras that were first available to the general public. One of the early ones I remember was a Kodak Brownie camera. It was a very box-like thing. I don't remember much more about it than the appearance. I don't know where the name "Brownie" came from either because I seem to remember it being all black.

When I was in high school (about 16 years old), I signed up for an optional photography class for about a half year. I don't remember us doing any colour photography, other than some hand tinting of black and white photos. We were often given specific assignments like going around our neighbourhood and taking photos of homes, being very aware of light and shadows so as to end up with the best possible shot of each house we selected to photograph. About that time, I decided to use our family dog as a subject for a couple of photos. About five or so years ago, while looking through one of my "Treasure Boxes" (filled with trinkets and school awards, etc.),I came across the one photo of "Jackie" I have saved all these years. He is standing directly in front of my camera, me squatted down on the ground to be at eye level with him, and he is looking right into the lens. Mostly all that you see of him is his face and long Spaniel ears and some of his body. The look in his eyes still says things to me and brings back to me the many years of childhood days spent with him. Yes, those old photos are worth getting out and looking at now and again. Incidentally, I had a slightly larger copy of that photo of "Jackie" made up and I have it framed and on my bedroom wall. Thanks again for some interesting reading...and reminding.

David said...

Thanks for your 'camera' story Art. I just researched the name of Kodak 'Brownie'. It was named after the cartoon characters of Palmer Cox. The Brownies were small pixie type beings. I still don't know why they named a camera after them though but I enjoyed the educational divesion.